MUSHRIK AHMAD RAZA KHAN BARELVI

MAULANA AHMAD RAZA KHAN BARELVI writes in his book (ALAMN UL AALA) that in asking for anything from ALLAH, there is a risk of imaan being destroyed but if you are asking for anything from saints(buzurg or wali) there is no risk of imaan being destroyed,so instead of asking from ALLAH ask from the saints as they are able to fulfill all ur wishes.

• ALLAH had himself made it clear in the surah AHQAAF in para no.26 verse no 6 that who will be more gumraah(one who deviates from the right path) then that person who asks for something from someone else other than ALLAH, who(saint) is not able to listen to him till QIYAMAH(doomsday) as he(saint) cannot listen to him.

This man with the name of Ahmad Raza Khan Barelvi is an open enemy of ISLAM who is urging people to deviate from the right path.

ulema-e-haq..Deoband

In his book (Alamn ulAala) Ahmad Raza Khan Barelvi says that nabi-e- karim(p.b.u.h) has the authority to close the door of forgiveness for someone in his life and he also has the authority to remain that door opened for anyone he want even after the death of that individual..this statement of Ahmad Raza Khan Barelvi has not been proved from either of the Quran or the hadith.If nabi-e-karim possessed such powers then he should have been opened that door for his beloved uncle Abu Talib whom he loved very much,he(p.b.u.h) sat by his side at the time of his death and asked him to embrace Islam and assured him to take all the responsibility for his entry into the the jannah(t).But Abu Talib didnt did that and died in the condition of kufr.Nabi e karim(p.b.u.h) became very sad on this incident, it was at that moment when Allah send Jibrail(alaihissalam) along with a (wahi) which states that //O Muhammed(p.b.u.h),dont get sad for those people who are not amongst you and allah will never forgive those who ignored him//if Muhammed(p.b.u.h)possessed such powers then he should have been opened that door for his beloved uncle...As far as the closing of the door is concerned it has been proved from the hadith that throughout his life nabi-e-karim(p.b.u.h) prayed for each and every living person that may Allah grant him the wealth of imaan...and it has been proven by quran that only Allah has that supreme power and he had confined that power and authority upto him that he will forgive those whom he want to forgive and he will never forgive those whom he dont want to forgive...and Allah better knows everything and nothing is hidden from him...In this context that statement of Ahmad Raza Khan is an open shirk and a person with these thoughts cannot be a muslim...

As per the hadees that is generally quoted by barelvis...Hazrat omar(radiallahuanhu)says that once nabi-e-karim(p.b.u.h) stood up for khutba(speech)and continued speaking by the time till every ummati became jannati and jahannami...this hadees is completely true as per the rawah-ul-bukhari.But as per the barelvi clarification that he (p.b.u.h) told the names of the first and last jannnati and that first and the last jahannami.now my question is that where those names have been gone?are these people able to tell those names except ashrah-ul-mubasshirah..and if they are not able to do so then their clarification is fake and it is nothing else than a shirk..and if these people say that hazrat omar(radiallahuanhu) had hidden those names due to some reason(maazallah). Can someone expect this kind of act fron hadrat omar.that nabi-e-karim(p.b.u.h) tell him something and he hide that..barelvi clarification is an open insult of hadrat omar(radiallahuanhu)..and the people who did it cannot be muslims,and their followers also belong to that category.

as per the clarificarion made by ahmad raza khan barelvi that is posted on faiz e raza(fazil barelvi says that to keep long hair like faqirs is haram,while it has been clear from the hadees that fakhre alam(p.b.u.h)had long hair,and keeping long hair is sunnat-e-nabwi(p.b.u.h).fazil barelvi had himself made it clear that what sort of imaan does he had...and an ordinary muslim can easily understand that ///